Essay about smoking in public

The right to be free from harm is in some sense more basic than the rights one may have to perform certain activities. Smoking should be banned in public places. The numbers of smokers are not declining only increasing.


The second involves the short-term physiological irritation of the eyes, nose, mouth, throat, and lungs caused by the inhalation of smoke; let us call this the level of irritation.

This includes smoke in the workplace, restaurants, bars, and other public forums. The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first. The objective of this essay is not to ban smoking completely, but to ban the smoking practice in certain areas which are public places.

Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Smoking should be banned from public places Audience: If harm is indeed being caused, public policy should prevent the smoker from smoking in this room.

As this quote says, I think that our freedom has boundaries and we must know where our freedom ends. According to published research, an estimated 1, Americans die each day from a smoking related illness. Many people may say that smoking should not be banned because it is a free country and that person can walk away or move.

Children are easily influenced in their growing stages. We discourage people from jumping off buildings and from shooting themselves, yet we allow them to slowly kill themselves. Firstly, smoking can have harmful effects on theenvironment. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.

It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. The paper will at the end explore several policy considerations that might lead to the elimination of exposure to secondhand smoke.


If smoking is not allowed in public areas it discourages non-smokers from starting to smoke at all. The third involves the long-term risk of disease caused by repeated exposure to secondhand smoke; let us call this the level of disease.

Children of mothers who smoked while they were pregnant will have cancer, lung disease or some type of respiratory disease when they are born http: This paper demonstrates that smokers generally do not have the right to smoke in public places, in a wide variety of cases, because it is inconsistent with their duty to respect the right of others to be free from harm.

When people come in contact with second-hand smoke people may experience headaches, respiratory illness, including asthma, pneumonia and bronchitis. Then a variety of arguments for smoking in public places presented.

Smoking in Public Places

It is a personal choice and a highly addictive habit. A powerful ingredient called nicotine causes most of this. Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. The nonsmoking homeowner has the ethical and legal right to stipulate policy in his or her home, and an offender should not be allowed to exert pressure, knowingly or otherwise, on the homeowner.

My audience are very aware of.Arguments Against Smoking in Public Places Annoyance. Smoke is annoying when one would simply prefer not to breathe it. This is an offense to, or intrusion upon, the nonsmoker, rather than an obvious harm, so it is unlikely that we are going to get a straightforward application of the harm principle.

Essay about smoking in public. Post By: November 21, 0 Comment Nov 21, False conflict in the mommy wars essay chaine de valeur de porter explication essay ishmael an adventure of the mind and spirit essay what are your dreams college essay genetically modified foods essay thesis proposal essay about marketing plan writing abstracts.

In any argumentative essay, the writer should be able to show the contradicting views of people. For instance, in the argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer should explain what the consequences are for not setting up smoking zones.

Another point the argumentative essay should explain is whether there is any law that forbids smokers from using cigarettes in public. In such countries, the law explains where smoking zones are located, if any, and the punishment that smokers should face if they break the law by.

The objective of this essay is not to ban smoking completely, but to ban the smoking practice in certain areas which are public places. By banning smoking in all public areas, the government shows support for the fact that smoking is bad, and it helps to set changes to the mind set in people reminding them that smoking is not a healthy habit.

This is a ban smoking in public places essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree. The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the.

Argumentative essay smoking in public places Download
Essay about smoking in public
Rated 3/5 based on 50 review